Cool site pour acheter des pilules Ne pas se perdre venir sur.

Microsoft word - spfcic proceedings 2007.doc

Proceedings 61st Southern Pasture & Forage Crop Improvement Conference, 2007 CURRENT APPLICATIONS TO ALLEVIATE ANIMAL STRESS ASSOCIATED WITH
Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center Endophyte-infected tall fescue (EI-TF; Festuca arundinacea (Schreb), syn, Lolium
(Schreb.) Darbysh) is a common pasture forage throughout the transition zone and
one of the most persistent and productive forages in the world. The agronomically beneficial
characteristics of EI-TF are a result, at least in part, of the presence of endophytic fungi
(Neotyphodium coenophialum), which produces numerous ergot alkaloids (Bacon et al., 1977).
It is estimated that approximately 70% of the more than 40 million acres of tall fescue grown in
the southeastern U.S. is infected with these fungi (Shelby and Dalrymple, 1987). Ruminants
grazing EI-TF generally exhibit a stressful multifaceted disease syndrome called fescue toxicosis
(Hoveland et al., 1983; Paterson et al., 1995). Further, we have recently found that ruminants
consuming EI-TF seed diets shed more E. coli O157:H7 in their feces (Looper et al., 2007). It is
estimated that economic losses from animal consumption of EI-TF in the U.S. exceed $600
million annually (Allen and Segarra, 2001); consequently, U.S. beef producers need solutions for
reducing animal stress resulting from the consumption EI-TF.
Management strategies to minimize or alleviate fescue toxicosis
The following considerations are by no means intended to be an exhaustive listing of all possible
management considerations that minimize stress associated with fescue toxicosis. An excellent
review of current research findings regarding fescue toxicosis can be found in the annual
proceedings of the Southern Extension and Research Activities Information Exchange Group at, as well as the book titled Neotyphodium in Cool-
Season Grasses
(2005; Roberts, West, and Spiers, Eds.; Blackwell Publishing).
Forage management. Several traditional options exist to minimize the physiological stress
associated with EI-TF consumption including reseeding of EI-TF pastures with endophyte-free
tall fescue, dilution of EI-TF pastures with legumes or other grasses, and(or) clipping EI-TF
pastures to remove the more toxic seedheads.
Within the last 10 years, novel endophyte-infected (“animal friendly”) tall fescue (NE-TF)
varieties have been developed (West et al., 1998; Bouton et al., 2002) with endophytes that do
not produce ergot-alkaloids and do not reduce animal performance. Researchers from Georgia
(Parish et al., 2003; Watson et al., 2004) and Arkansas (Nihsen et al., 2004) found average daily
gain and gain/acre were greater in cattle grazing NE-TF pastures than cattle grazing EI-TF. We
(USDA-ARS, Booneville, AR) are completing a 3-year study investigating the influence of EI-
TF and NE-TF on performance of pregnant heifers. Our preliminary data suggest cattle grazing
NE-TF gain 0.6 lb/day more than EI-TF cattle. Further, cattle grazing EI-TF spend more time in
the shade and around water tanks than heifers grazing NE-TF pastures.
The major issues with renovation of existing EI-TF pastures with improved forage varieties
are the costs, both the input, as well as the opportunity costs of reseeding. Opportunity costs are
those losses in profit due to not grazing newly renovated NE-TF pastures during the
establishment time. Beck et al. (2006) recently estimated that it cost $232/acre to establish NE-
TF pastures with almost $80 of that being opportunity costs. In comparison, cool-season annuals
(ryegrass and winter wheat) cost an average of almost $115/acre. To minimize input costs to
farmers, University of Arkansas researchers (K. Coffey), with assistance from USDA-ARS,
Booneville, AR have initiated a study to determine the impact (both animal performance and
economics) of renovating a portion (approximately 20%) of EI-TF pastures with NE-TF. Cattle
will graze NE-TF during warmer months of the year instead of EI-TF pastures to minimize the
stress associated with fescue toxicosis. A second major concern of incorporating NE-TF
varieties is persistence of the stand. Several studies are ongoing to determine the persistence of
NE-TF in comparison to EI-TF pastures.
There has been a renewed interest in stockpiling of EI-TF mainly due to a reduction in winter
feed costs by approximately 60 to 75% when compared to conventional winter supplementation
practices (Bishop-Hurley and Kallenbach, 2001; Jennings et al., 2004). Tall fescue provides
sufficient forage growth and quality during winter months, and concentrations of ergovaline that
induce fescue toxicosis are lower during the colder months (Kallenbach et al., 2003; Looper et
al., 2005). In a 2-year supplementation study using market cows, research from USDA-ARS in
Booneville, AR (Looper et al., 2005) showed nutritive content of stockpiled and spring-growth
EI-TF exceeded the nutrient requirements of pregnant market cows, and as long as EI-TF forage
was not limited, supplementation was not necessary to maintain body weight of cows. Further,
concentrations of ergovaline did not exceed values that are associated with fescue toxicosis
suggesting stress of EI-TF consumption may be reduced during the winter.
Animal management. Supplementation of either protein or energy to cattle grazing EI-TF
causes a ‘substitution effect’ that may help in alleviating fescue toxicosis (Aiken et al., 1998).
Adjusting stocking rate of cattle grazing EI-TF pastures also may help in minimizing fescue
toxicosis. The decrease of EI-TF canopy height by either close grazing or clipping may decrease
the toxicity of standing EI-TF pastures since a greater amount of ergot alkaloids are found in the
seed. However, Aiken et al. (2006) reported serum prolactin (a physiological indicator of fescue
toxicosis) decreased as stocking rate increased suggesting greater consumption of rapidly
growing EI-TF in overstocked pastures may actually exacerbate fescue toxicosis. The limited
availability of forages with heavy stocking rates also would affect animal performance.
Obviously one approach to reduce animal stress associated with EI-TF is to remove cattle
from pastures with EI-TF. Extensive research has been conducted on removal of cattle for a
certain amount of time (often referred to as recovery) to alleviate the effects of EI-TF during the
warm summer months or before transport to the auction barn or feedyard. Aiken et al. (2001,
2006) reported that physiological indicators of fescue toxicosis (i.e., rectal temperatures and
concentrations of prolactin) in steers consuming EI-TF returned to normal values after 3 to 4
days of a EI-TF-free diet for Brahman-influenced steers and 8-10 days of a EI-TF-free diet in
British-influenced steers. For a more detailed report of research investigating recovery of cattle
from the toxic effects of EI-TF, see Dr. Glen Aiken’s manuscript in these proceedings.
Numerous animal studies during the past 25 years have investigated the use of
pharmacological compounds, such as anthelmintics and steroid implants that minimize stress
related to consumption of EI-TF. The use of anthelmintics to reduce stress associated with
fescue toxicosis has not been consistent. Bransby (1997) reported that steers grazing EI-TF had
greater weight gain when administered ivermectin; however, others (Goetsch et al., 1988;
Rosenkrans et al., 2001) reported no effect of ivermectin on weight gains of steers. Similarly,
studies with steroid implants administered to cattle grazing EI-TF have had mixed results.
Steroid implants increased average daily gain by 14% in steers grazing EI-TF (Coffey et al.,
2001) but steroid implants did not impact recovery of steers after grazing EI-TF (Aiken et al.,
2006). Type of implant, as well as forage quality and availability would affect animal
performance and may explain differences in results among studies.
Novel approaches to an old problem
It is evident from the aforementioned research findings, development of plant and animal
management strategies have made substantial progress in minimizing some of the stress
associated with EI-TF consumption. However, there is still much we do not fully understand of
the plant-animal interaction concerning EI-TF consumption. Novel approaches to this ‘old’
problem are needed and are currently being investigated, especially those that may be widely
implemented by producers. Although not a comprehensive list, a few of the novel approaches
that have interesting preliminary data are discussed here.
A majority of the research of how EI-TF consumption affects reproductive performance of
cattle has focused on the female. Recognizing that the fertility of 1 bull may impact 20 to 25
cows, research efforts are now investigating the impact of EI-TF on the fertility of the bull.
Bulls fed a pelleted EI-TF seed diet had smaller scrotal circumferences and tended to have
decreased semen motility after 6 weeks exposure to EI-TF than non-EI-TF diets (Jones et al.,
2004). Although semen motility and morphology did not differ between bulls fed control or
ergotamine tartrate (alkaloid found in EI-TF) supplemented diets, development of embryos
fertilized with semen from bulls fed ergotamine tartrate were decreased (Schuenemann et al.,
2005). To confirm and expand these results, a study has been initiated at the USDA-ARS
laboratory in Booneville, AR in collaboration with University of Arkansas researchers to assess
how EI-TF and NE-TF impact bull performance and semen quality.
A considerable amount of research with horses has been conducted with the dopamine
receptor blocker, domperidone (Cross et al., 1999). Domperidone was effective in alleviating a
majority of the signs/symptoms of fescue toxicosis in pregnant mares. Work in cattle indicates
that heifers consuming EI-TF seed diets and administered domperidone had similar daily weight
gains as heifers consuming non-EI-TF seed diets (Jones et al., 2003). Further, domperidone may
help in minimizing the toxic effects of EI-TF on reproduction in cattle. The USDA-ARS
laboratory in Lexington, KY has ongoing studies to investigate the influence of domperidone on
mammary development of heifers consuming EI-TF in their diets.
The implementation of doppler ultrasonography to determine blood flow in cattle consuming
EI-TF shows extreme promise to further our understanding of the physiological mechanisms of
fescue toxicosis. Research recently completed at the USDA-ARS laboratory in Lexington, KY
(Aiken et al., 2007) reveals that short-term exposure to EI-TF will result in vasoconstriction of
blood vessels in heifers consuming EI-TF.
For years, livestock producers have unintentionally or in some cases intentionally selected
cattle that were more productive when grazing EI-TF. Cattle that did not maintain an annual
calving cycle or that consistently produced a lighter calf at weaning were eventually culled from
the cowherd. However, use of traditional selection techniques is slow, usually occurring over
several years for individual animals. This process may be accelerated by the use of non-
traditional methods such as physiological and(or) genetic markers. Understanding the animal
response to the EI-TF stressors, particularly at the genetic and physiologic levels, is an area
needing further exploration to develop new approaches to confront this problem. The liver is a
detoxification organ involved in metabolism of toxins. Using DNA microarray techniques,
University of Missouri researchers have shown that even short-term exposure to EI-TF diets
down-regulated genes involved in cholesterol and lipid metabolism found in the liver of rodents
(Bhusari et al., 2006; Settivari et al., 2006). Researchers at the University of Arkansas in
collaboration with USDA-ARS, Booneville, AR have demonstrated that linking physiological
changes to their genetic origins can be related to cow profitability traits. Current efforts focus on
genetic and(or) physiological markers that can be useful in selecting cattle that are more
productive on EI-TF. Specifically, how polymorphisms (specific genetic variations between
individual animals) in the prolactin gene enhancer region and heat shock protein gene in cattle
are related to productivity while grazing EI-TF is being investigated. Dr. Charles Rosenkrans’
manuscript in these proceedings thoroughly discusses the genetic variations in cattle consuming
Endophyte-infected tall fescue is one of the most persistent and productive forages grown
throughout the Southeast U.S. with one major disadvantage, a reduction in animal performance
due to fescue toxicosis. Much progress has been made to help livestock producers minimize
animal stress associated with consumption of EI-TF; however, additional work is still needed to
alleviate this very economically costly problem. Currently, several innovative techniques and
technologies seek alternative solutions to the endophyte problem. An increased understanding of
animal responses to EI-TF forages will be the basis of new and(or) improved best management
practices for cost-effective beef production in the U.S.
Literature Cited
Aiken, G. E., D. M. Ball, E. L. Piper, and C. P. West. 1998. Performance of steers fed a broiler litter-corn mixture on endophyte-infested and non-infested tall fescue. Prof. Anim. Sci. 14:51-55. Aiken, G. E., B. H. Kirch, J. R. Strickland, L. P. Bush, M. L. Looper, and F. N. Schrick. 2007. Hemodynamic responses of the caudal artery to toxic tall fescue in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. (In press). Aiken, G. E., M. L. Looper, S. F. Tabler, D. K. Brauer, J. R. Strickland, and F. N. Schrick. 2006. Influence of stocking rate and steroidal implants on growth rate of steers grazing toxic tall fescue and subsequent physiological responses. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1626-1632. Aiken, G. E., E. L. Piper, and C. R. Miesner. 2001. Influence of protein supplementation and implant status on alleviating fescue toxicosis. J. Anim. Sci. 79:827-832. Allen, V. G., and E. Segarra. 2001. Anti-quality components in forage; Overview, significance, and economic impact. J. Range Manag. 54:409-412. Bacon, C. W. J. K. Porter, J. D. Robbins, and E. S. Luttrell. 1977. Epichloe typhina from toxic tall fescue grasses. App. Environ. Microbiol. 34:576-581. Beck, P., S. Gunter, K. Lusby, C. West, B. Watkins, and D. Hubbell. 2006. Animal performance and economics of novel endophyte tall fescues. In Forage Management – from Basic to High Tech. Proc. AR For. Grassl. Coun. pp. 22-29. Ft. Smith, AR. Bhusari, S., L. B. Hearne, D. E. Spiers, W. R. Lamberson, and E. Antoniou. 2006. Effect of fescue toxicosis on hepatic gene expression in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1600-1612. Bishop-Hurley, G. J., and R. L. Kallenbach. 2001. The economics of grazing beef cows during winter. Proc. Am. For. Grassl. Coun. p 274. Springdale, AR. Bouton, J. H., G. C. M. Latch, N. S. Hill, C. S. Hoveland, M. A. McCann, R. H. Watson, J. A. Parish, L. L. Hawkins, and F. N. Thompson. 2002. Reinfection of tall fescue cultivars with nonergot alkaloid-producing endophytes. Agron. J. 94:567-574. Bransby, D. I. 1997. Steer weight gain responses to ivermectin when grazing fescue. Large Anim. Pract. 18:16-19. Coffey, K. P., W. K. Coblentz, J. B. Humphry, E. L. Piper, C. F. Rosenkrans, Jr., D. S. Hubbell, III, K. F. Harrison, T. M. Denard, F. W. Pohlman, D. H. Hellwig, L. B. Daniels, and L. J. McBeth. 2001. Growth performance and serum prolactin concentrations of stocker steers implanted with trenbolone acetate while grazing endophyte-infected fescue in the spring. Prof. Anim. Sci. 17:166-173. Cross, D. L., K. Anas, W. C. Bridges, and J. H. Chappell. 1999. Clinical effects of domperidone on fescue toxicosis in pregnant mares. Proc. Am. Assoc. Equine Pract. 45:203-206. Goetsch, A. L., K. L. Landis, G. E. Murphy, B. L. Morrison, Z. B. Johnson, E. L. Piper, A. C. Hardin, and K. L. Hall. 1988. Supplements, parasite treatments, and growth implants, for Brahman or English crossbred steers grazing endophyte-infected or noninfected fescue in the spring and fall. Prof. Anim. Sci. 4:32-38. Hoveland, C. S., S. P. Schmidt, C. C. King, Jr., J. W. Odom, E. M. Clark, J. A. McGuire, L. A. Smith, H. W. Grimes, and J. L. Holiman. 1983. Steer performance and association of Acremonium coenophialum fungal endophyte on tall fescue pasture. Agron. J. 75:821-824. Jennings, J. A., D. E. Kratz, M. S. Gadberry, and T. R. Troxel. 2004. Reducing winter feed costs with stockpiled forages – a farm-based demonstration program. Proc. Am. For. Grassl. Coun. 13:352. Roanoke, VA. Jones, K. L., S. S. King, K. E. Griswold, D. Cazac, and D. L. Cross. 2003. Domperidone can ameliorate deleterious reproductive effects and reduced weight gain associated with fescue toxicosis in heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2568-2574. Jones, K. L., C. R. McCleary, S. S. King, G. A. Apgar, and K. E. Griswold. 2004. Case Study: Consumption of toxic fescue impairs bull reproductive parameters. Prof. Anim. Sci. 20:437-442. Kallenbach, R. L., G. J. Bishop-Hurley, M. D. Massie, G. E. Rottinghaus, and C. P. West. 2003. Herbage mass, nutritive value, and ergovaline concentration of stockpiled tall fescue. Crop Sci. 43:1001-1005.
Looper, M. L., G. E. Aiken, R. Flores, and C. F. Rosenkrans, Jr. 2005. Influence of nutrient
supplementation on body weight and condition, and pregnancy of market beef cows grazing
stockpiled and spring-growth tall fescue. Prof. Anim. Sci. 21:225-231.
Looper, M. L., T. S. Edrington, R. Flores, J. M. Burke, T. R. Callaway, G. E. Aiken, F. N.
Schrick, and C. F. Rosenkrans, Jr. 2007. Influence of dietary endophyte-infected
(Neotyphodium coenophialum) tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) seed on fecal shedding of
antibiotic-resistance selected Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1102-1108.
Nihsen, M. E., E. L. Piper, C. P. West, R. J. Crawford, Jr., T. M. Denard, Z. B. Johnson, C. A.
Roberts, D. A. Spiers, and C. F. Rosenkrans, Jr. 2004. Growth rate and physiology of steers
grazing tall fescue inoculated with novel endophytes. J. Anim. Sci. 82:878-883.
Parish, J. A., M. A. McCann, R. H. Watson, N. N. Paviva, C. S. Hoveland, A. H. Parks, B. L.
Upchurch, N. S. Hill, and J. H. Bouton. 2003. Use of nonergot alkaloid-producing endophytes
for alleviating tall fescue toxicosis in stocker cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2856-2868.

Paterson, J., C. Forcherio, B. Larson, M. Samford, and M. Kerley. 1995. The effects of
fescue toxicosis on beef cattle productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 73:889-898.
Rosenkrans, Jr., C., T. Bedingfield, and E. Piper. 2001. Physiological responses of steers to
ingestion of endophyte-infected fescue hay, ivermectin treatment and immune challenge. pp.
255-260. In V. H. Paul and P. D. Dapprich (ed.), The Grassland Conference Proc. 4th Int.
Neotyphodium/Grass Interactions Symp., Soest, Germany.
Schuenemann, G. M., J. L. Edwards, M. D. Davis, H. E. Blackmon, F. N. Scenna, N. R.
Rohrbach, A. M. Saxton, H. S. Adair, F. M. Hopkins, J. C. Waller, and F. N. Schrick. 2005.
Effects of administration of ergotamine tartrate on fertility of yearling beef bulls.
Theriogenology 63:1407-1418. Settivari, R. S., S. Bhusari, T. Evans, P. A. Eichen, L. B. Hearne, E. Antoniou, and D. E. Spiers. 2006. Genomic analysis of the impact of fescue toxicosis on hepatic function. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1279-1294. Shelby, R. A., and L. W. Dalrymple. 1987. Incidence and distribution of the tall fescue endophyte in the United States. Plant Dis. 71:783-786. Watson, R. H., M. A. McCann, J. A. Parish, C. S. Hoveland, F. N. Thompson, and J. H. Bouton.
2004. Productivity of cow-calf pairs grazing tall fescue pastures infected with either the wild-
type endophyte or a nonergot alkaloid-producing endophyte strain, AR542. J. Anim. Sci.
West, C. P., M. L. Marlett, M. E. McConnell, E. L. Piper, and T. J. King. 1998. Novel
endophyte technology: Selection of the fungus. pp.105-115. In E. C. Brummer, N. S. Hill, and
C. A. Roberts (ed.), Molecular and Cellular Technologies for Forage Improvement, Madison,
WI: Crop Science Society of America.


The Lasting Effects of Using Auricular Acupuncture to Treat Combat-related PTSD: A Case Study By Greg Golden, MSOM, DiplOM (NCCAOM), LAc AbstractPost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a condition of certain psychological symptoms occurring long Greg Golden , MSOM, DiplOM (NCCAOM), LAc was trained in the NADA protocol at the Lincoln Recovery term after a traumatic event or series of such

What Is Peripheral Vascular Disease? Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) refers to (PAD) is a type of organic PVD. It’s caused by diseases of blood vessels outside the heart and fatty buildups (atherosclerosis) in the inner wal s brain. It’s often a narrowing of vessels that carry of arteries; these deposits block normal blood flow. blood to the legs, arms, stomach or kidneys. There

Copyright © 2010-2014 Predicting Disease Pdf