European Society of Hypertension Scientific Newsletter:Update on Hypertension Management
Franco Mantero1, Gian Paolo Rossi2, Enrico Agabiti Rosei3
1Endocrine Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padua, Italy
2Internal Medicine 4, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padua, Italy
3Clinica Medica, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common form of endocrine hypertension in
Diagnosis of PA is divided into different steps including: case detection, case
which aldosterone production is inappropriate and at least partially autono-
confirmation, and subtype classification.
mous of the renin–angiotensin system. The inappropriate production of aldos-terone results in sodium retention and suppression of renin. PA is commonly
caused by an adrenal adenoma or bilateral hyperplasia of the adrenocorticalzona glomerulosa, and in very rare cases by the inherited condition of gluco-
Case detection of PA is recommended in patient groups with relatively high preva-
corticoid-remediable aldosteronism (GRA) also known as Familial Hyperaldos-
lences of PA. These include patients with: stage 2 (>160–179/100–109 mm Hg),
stage 3 (>180/110 mm Hg), or drug-resistant hypertension; hypertension and
Some misconceptions concerning PA must be addressed. PA was held to
spontaneous or diuretic-induced hypokalaemia; hypertension with adrenal
account for less than 1% of hypertensive patients and, moreover, hypokalaemia
incidentaloma; or hypertension and a family history of early-onset hyperten-
was considered a prerequisite for pursuing the diagnostic tests for PA 
sion or cerebrovascular accident at a young age (< 40 yr).
However, recent studies carried out by applying the plasma aldosterone/plas-
The Aldosterone-Renin Ratio (ARR) is currently the most reliable means
ma renin activity (PRA) ratio (ARR) as a screening test in hypertensive patients,
available for screening for PA. It is recommended that hypokalaemia be cor-
regardless of the presence or absence of hypokalaemia, have found a much
rected and that those drugs which could cause false-positive or false-negative
higher prevalence of this disease, with PA accounting for up to 12% of hyper-
results be removed for at least 2–3 weeks, before measuring the ARR. Like all
tensive patients. In recent studies, only a minority of patients with PA (9 to
biochemical case detection tests, the ARR is not without false positives and
37%) had hypokalaemia . Thus, normokalaemic hypertension constitutes the
false negatives and can be affected by numerous conditions (see
most common presentation of the disease, with hypokalaemia probably being
[3, 6]. The ARR should therefore be regarded as a detection test only and
present only in the more severe cases . An early diagnosis of PA is crucially
should be repeated if the initial results are inconclusive or difficult to interpret
important not just because PA is common and if overlooked exposes the patient
because of suboptimal sampling conditions. It should also be appreciated
to the need for long-life treatment, but even more so because if undiagnosed
that the ARR conveys quantitative information: in other words a markedly
and not properly treated these patients have higher cardiovascular morbidity
elevated value should be taken as a strong indication for the presence of PA,
and mortality than age-, sex, blood-, and pressure-matched patients with es-
which can warrant adrenal vein sampling without any further confirmation,
sential hypertension, including a greater incidence of left ventricular hypertro-
while borderline elevated values should be repeated and perhaps followed by
phy, fibrosis, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and stroke . In fact,
aldosterone has been shown to induce endothelial dysfunction, norepinephrine
In recent years it has become more common to use the direct active renin
release, cardiovascular fibrosis, and proteinuria, independently from increase of
assay instead of the plasma renin activity (PRA) to evaluate the renin–angio-
blood pressure. Furthermore, specific treatments are available that ameliorate
tensin system. A major problem is that there are important and confounding
the impact of this condition on patient-important outcomes (Figure 1).
differences across laboratories regarding the methods and units used to reportvalues of renin and aldosterone; this, together with the lack of uniformity indiagnostic protocols, has been associated with substantial variability in cut-off
values used by different groups, ranging from 20 to 100 as ng/dl Aldo over ng/
The growing recognition of PA as a common and important contributor to
/dl/hr (or 68 to 338 as pMol/L over mU/L) . Most groups, however, use cut-offs
hypertension development and cardiovascular disease has led to a “Renais-
of 20–40 (for Aldo in ng/dl over PRA in ng/ml/h) (68–135) when testing is
sance” in interest regarding the detection and diagnostic workup of this
performed in the morning on a seated ambulatory patient. In the largest avail-
disorder by clinicians involved in the treatment of hypertensive patients. The
able study in which the ARR was used to identify the only PA subtype that could
Clinical Guidelines Committee of The Endocrine Society  has developed
be conclusively diagnosed based on the “four corners” criteria, the optimal cut-
clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PA.
off for the ARR (PAC in ng/dl, PRA in ng/ml/h) was 25.86 .
Factors that may affect the aldosterone–renin ratio and thus lead to falsepositive or false negative results 
*Renin inhibitors lower PRA but raise DRC. This would be expected to result in false--positive ARR levels for renin measured as PRA and false negatives for renin measu-
Flowchart outlining the suggested work-up of patients with hypertension
red as DRC; PHA-2 — pseudohypoaldosteronism type 2 (familial hypertension and
and increased risk of hyperaldosteronism 
hyperkalemia with normal glomerular filtration rate)
ty of this test depends heavily on the size of the adenoma; consequently,
Once a high ARR has been determined confirmatory tests should be per-
this method is useless in interpreting micronodular findings obtained with
formed to definitively confirm or exclude PA . At present, four confirmatory
high-resolution CT and has no major role in subtype evaluation  in most
tests to definitively confirm or exclude the diagnosis are used: oral sodium
centres. Moreover, the shortage of the radiotracer currently makes this test
loading, saline infusion, fludrocortisone suppression, and captopril challenge.
These four tests are in common use even though their usefulness is supported
• 18-Hydroxycorticosterone levels.
18-Hydroxycorticosterone is formed by
at best by a level of evidence C by the AHA criteria, and therefore the level of
18-hydroxylation of corticosterone. Patients with APA generally have re-
recommendation for their use is only Iib. Moreover, there is currently insuffi-
cumbent plasma 18-hydroxycorticosterone levels greater than 100 ng/dl at
cient direct evidence to recommend any one of these above the others. These
0800 h, whereas patients with IHA have levels that are usually less than
tests may differ in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and reliability, but the
100 ng/dl. However, this test lacks the accuracy needed to guide the clini-
choice of a confirmatory test is usually determined by considerations of cost,
cian in the subtype evaluation of PA .
patient compliance, laboratory facilities, and local expertise. The most com-
• Testing for familiar forms of PA[FH-I (GRA)].
FH-1 syndrome is responsible
monly used test is the saline infusion test (2 L over 4 hrs) with a temptative
for less than 1% of cases of PA and it is inherited in an autosomal dominant
cut-off for post infusion plasma aldosterone above 7 ng/dl . It should be
fashion. It may be diagnosed in patients with onset of PA earlier than at
noted that confirmatory tests requiring oral or IV sodium loading should be
20 years of age and in those who have a family history of PA or of strokes
administered with caution in patients with uncontrolled hypertension or con-
at young age. Genetic testing by either Southern blot  or long PCR
gestive heart failure. As all these tests rely on the presumed autonomy of the
techniques is sensitive and specific for GRA. FH-II syndrome us clinically
aldosterone production from angiotensin II, which apparently is not the case
indistinguishable from non-familiar PA. It is an autosomal dominant disor-
in all aldosterone-producing adenoma, these tests are fraught with a large
der. GRA mutation testing is negative. Its prevalence has not been estab-
number of false negative and false positive results, and therefore some ex-
lished. An association with chromosomal region 7p22 has been shown .
perts support the view that they should not be used as they can lead to
• A further approach that is being tested to identify lateralizedaldosterone
curative adrenalectomy not being given to many patients.
excess entails C11methomidate positrone emissiontomography. However, itremains to be demonstrated if it couldidentify the majority of APAs that, asmentioned above, are small.
Subtype classificationAll patients with primary aldosteronism should undergo adrenal computed
as the initial subtype study, to exclude large masses thatmay represent adrenocortical carcinoma and to ascertain the right adrenal
Treatment of choice in documented unilateral PA (APA or UHA) is unilateral
vein anatomy, which is useful for planning and adrenal vein sampling. Of
laparoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas medical treatment with mineralocorti-
these indications, adrenal CT has no place for differentiation of PA subtypes.
coid receptor antagonists is indicated in patients with bilateral adrenal dis-
In fact, small APAs may be overlooked, and/or non-functioning adenoma
ease (idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia, bilateral APA, GRA).
(“incidentaloma”) on one side can be considered the “culprit” for PA while
Surgical treatment in patients with unilateral PA shows improvement of
instead the latter is due to a small CT-undetectable APA or unilateral hyperpla-
serum potassium concentrations in nearly 100% of patients postoperatively 
sia on the contralateral side. Moreover, apparent adrenal microadenomas
when the diagnosis and the indication of adrenalectomy are made based on
may actually represent areas of hyperplasia, and unilateral adrenalectomy
AVS. Hypertension is cured (defined as blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg with-
would be inappropriate. In addition, non-functioning unilateral adrenal mac-
out the aid of antihypertensive drugs) in about 50% (range 35–60%) of patients
roadenomas are not uncommon, especially in older patients (> 40 years old)
with APA after unilateral adrenalectomy, with a cure rate as high as 56–77%
and are indistinguishable from APAs on CT. Unilateral UAH (unilateral adrenal
when the cure threshold is blood pressure less than 160/95 mm Hg .
hyperplasia) may be visible, but also invisible on CT. Magnetic resonance
Factors associated with resolution of hypertension in the postoperative
has no advantage over CT in subtype evaluation of PA, being more
period include having no more than one first-degree relative with hyperten-
expensive and more prone to motion artefacts than CT.
sion, preoperative use of one or two antihypertensive drugs , known
Lateralization of the source of excessive aldosterone secretion is critical to
duration of hypertension, and the presence of vascular remodelling . As
guide the management of PA. Imaging cannot reliably visualize microade-
compared with open adrenalectomy, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is associat-
nomas or distinguish incidentalomas from APAs with confidence , making
ed with shorter hospital stays and fewer complications .
Adrenal Vein Sampling (AVS)
the most accurate way of differentiating unilat-
In patients who do not undergo surgery and in those presenting bilateral
adrenal disease, medical treatment is indicated as follows:
• MR antagonists
appear to be effective in the control of blood pressure and
It must be understood that AVS should be offered to the patients only if
surgical treatment is possible and desired by the patient. The sensitivity and
has been the agent of choice in the medical treatment of
specificity of AVS (95 and 100%, respectively) for detecting unilateral aldoster-
PA for more than four decades. Several observational studies in patients
one excess are superior to those of adrenal CT (78 and 75%, respectively) .
with IHA have reported a mean reduction in systolic blood pressure of 25%
Although AVS can be a difficult procedure, especially on the right adrenal
and diastolic blood pressure of 22% in response to spironolactone 50–
vein (which is smaller than the left and usually empties directly into the IVC
–400 mg/d for 1–96 months . The incidence of gynaecomastia with
rather than the renal vein), the success rate usually improves quickly as the
spironolactone therapy is dose related, whereas the exact incidence of
angiographer becomes more experienced . Currently, three protocols for
menstrual disturbances in premenopausal women with spironolactone ther-
AVS are used: 1) unstimulated sequential or simultaneous bilateral AVS, 2) un-
apy is unknown. Where available, canrenone (an active metabolite of spirono-
stimulated sequential or simultaneous bilateral AVS followed by bolus co-
lactone) or potassium canrenoate, might be considered because they possi-
syntropin-stimulated sequential or simultaneous bilateral AVS, and 3) con-
bly have fewer sex steroid-related side effects. In addition, a small dose of
tinuous cosyntropin infusion with sequential bilateral AVS. There are actually
a thiazide diuretic, triamterene, or amiloride can be added to avoid
no clear guidelines which recommend any particular protocol and data are
a higher dose of spironolactone which may cause side effects. The starting
lacking on the impact of AVS on clinical outcomes . Some form of patient
dose for spironolactone should be 12.5–25 mg daily in a single dose. The
stratification is required, possibly firstly identifying which patients should
lowest effective dose should be found by very gradually titrating upward to
proceed to surgery set against those who can be managed on effective medi-
cal therapy with Mineralocorticoid Receptor antagonists. The use of AVS must
is a newer, selective MR antagonist without antiandrogen and
be justified on a case-by-case basis, asking how it will improve patient care
progesterone agonist effects, thus reducing the rate of adverse endocrine
and outcome, and be undertaken in centres of excellence to achieve optimal
side effects. Eplerenone has 60% of the MR antagonist potency of spirono-
lactone; its better tolerability profile needs to be balanced against its high-er cost, shorter duration of action requiring multiple daily dosing, and the
lack of current clinical trial evidence for its use in PA . The starting dose
• Posture stimulation test
. In patients with unsuccessful AVS and with a CT
for eplerenone is 25 mg once or twice daily.
scan showing a unilateral adrenal mass, some experts use the posturestimulation test. This test, developed in the 1970s, was based on the find-
ing that the PAC in patients with APA showed diurnal variation and was
Up-regulation of distal tubular sodium epithelial channel activity is a major
relatively unaffected by changes in angiotensin II levels, whereas IHA was
mechanism whereby aldosterone exerts its actions on sodium and potassium
characterized by enhanced sensitivity to small changes in angiotensin II
handling. Of the available epithelial sodium channel antagonists, amiloride
that occur with standing. Recent reviews showed an accuracy of 85% of
has been the most studied as a mode of treatment for PA. Although less
this test. The lack of accuracy is explained by the fact that some APAs are
efficacious than spironolactone, amiloride may be useful. Being a potassium-
sensitive to angiotensin II and some patients with IHA have diurnal varia-
-sparing diuretic, amiloride can ameliorate both hypertension and hy-
tion in aldosterone secretion. Thus, the posture stimulation test may have
pokalaemia in patients with PA and is generally well tolerated, lacking the sex
an ancillary role, for example, in those patients for whom AVS was unsuc-
steroid-related side effects of spironolactone, but without the beneficial ef-
cessful and CT shows a unilateral adrenal mass .
fects on endothelial function . Calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-
• Iodocholesterol scintigraphy
. [131I]19-Iodocholesterol scintigraphy was first
-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers have been
used in the early 1970s, and an improved agent, [6b-131I]iodomethyl-19-
evaluated in very few patients with PA, and in general they are antihyperten-
-norcholesterol (NP-59), was introduced in 1977. The NP-59 scan, per-
sive drugs without a major effect on aldosterone excess. Supportive studies
formed with dexamethasone suppression, had the putative advantage of
are small and methodologically weak and have not measured patient-impor-
correlating function with anatomical abnormalities. However, the sensitivi-
tant outcomes. Aldosterone synthase inhibitors may play a role in the future.
11. Seccia TM, Miotto D, De Toni R, et al. Adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation during adrenal vein
sampling for identifying surgically curable subtypes of primary aldosteronism: comparison of 3 dif-
1. Kaplan NM. Clinical hypertension. 6th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994: 389–408.
ferent protocols. Hypertension 2009; 53: 761–766.
2. Mulatero P, Stowasser M, Loh KC, et al. Increased diagnosis of primary aldosteronism, including surgi-
12. Stewart PM, Allolio B. Adrenal vein sampling for Primary Aldosteronism: time for a reality check.
cally correctable forms, in centers from five continents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 1045–
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010; 72: 146–148.
13. Espiner EA, Ross DG, Yandle TG, Richards AM, Hunt PJ. Predicting surgically remedial primary aldos-
3. Rossi GP, Bernini G, Caliumi C, et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of primary aldosteronism
teronism: role of adrenal scanning, posture testing, and adrenal vein sampling. J Clin Endocrinol
in 1,125 hypertensive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2293–2300.
4. Milliez P, Girerd X, Plouin PF, Blacher J, Safar ME, Mourad JJ. Evidence for an increased rate of cardio-
14. Mansoor GA, Malchoff CD, Arici MH, Karimeddini MK, Whalen GF. Unilateral adrenal hyperplasia
vascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1243–1248.
causing primary aldosteronism: limitations of I-131 norcholesterol scanning. Am J Hypertens 2002;
5. Funder JW, Carey RM, Fardella C, et al. Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with
primary aldosteronism: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
15. Lifton RP, Dluhy RG, Powers M, et al. A chimaeric 11 beta-hydroxylase/aldosterone synthase gene
causes glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism and human hypertension. Nature 1992; 355: 262–265.
6. Stowasser M, Gordon RD. The aldosterone-renin ratio for screening for primary aldosteronism.
16. So A, Duffy DL, Gordon RD, et al. Familial hyperaldosteronism type II is linked to the chromosome
Endocrinologist 2004; 14: 267–276.
7p22 region but also shows predicted heterogeneity. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1477–1484.
7. Young WF. Primary aldosteronism: renaissance of a syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 2007; 66: 607–
17. Sawka AM, Young WF, Thompson GB, et al. Primary aldosteronism: factors associated with nor-
malization of blood pressure after surgery. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 258–261.
18. Rossi GP, Bolognesi M, Rizzoni D, et al. Vascular remodeling and duration of hypertension predict
8. Rossi GP, Belfiore A, Bernini G, et al.; and for the Primary Aldosteronism Prevalence in Italy Study
outcome of adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism patients. Hypertension 2008; 51: 1366–1371.
Investigators. Comparison of the captopril and the saline infusion test for excluding Aldosterone-
19. Jacobsen NE, Campbell JB, Hobart MG. Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for surgical adre-
-Producing Adenoma. Hypertension 2007; 50: 424–431.
nal disease. Can J Urol 2003; 10: 1995–1999.
9. Young WF, Stanson AW, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Farley DR, van Heerden JA. Role for adrenal
20. Burgess ED, Lacourciere Y, Ruilope-Urioste LM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of the selective
venous sampling in primary aldosteronism. Surgery 2004; 136: 1227–1235.
aldosterone blocker eplerenone in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2388–2404.
10. Nwariaku FE, Miller BS, Auchus R, et al. Primary hyperaldosteronism: effect of adrenal vein sam-
21. Lim PO, Young WF, MacDonald TM. A review of the medical treatment of primary aldosteronism.
pling on surgical outcome. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 497–502.
RUTH CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES PTY LTD A.B.N. 18 001 840 080 Unit 5, 7-9 Kent Road Mascot NSW 2020 Australia Postal Address: P.O. Box 6316, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia. Phone: 61 2 9667 0700 Fax: 61 2 9669 0430 Emergency Telephone: 1800 257 193 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Internet: www.rci.com.au SECTION 1 - IDENTIFICATION OF THE MATERIAL AND THE SUPPLIER Product Name:
L’effet placebo 1 • Futur verbe placere « je plairai » • « méthode commode de traitement » • Pierre Pichot 1961 « l’effet placebo est, lors de l’administration d’une drogue active, la différence entre la modification constatée et celle imputable à l’action pharmacologique de la drogue » • Substance inerte délivrée dans un contexte t